Sunday, April 06, 2008

A Trip in Mornington Peninsula (1)

IMG_4176.jpg (by changyang1230)
One day, a group of people called Fotoholics decided to organise a "photography camp".

IMG_4172.jpg (by changyang1230)
The trip blasted off with a visit in an animal farm,

IMG_4240.jpg (by changyang1230)
where we saw animals like ostriches,

IMG_4250.JPG (by changyang1230)
horse,

IMG_4242.jpg (by changyang1230)
rabbit,

IMG_4269.jpg (by changyang1230)
and goat. (Yes, this particular one had its head stuck between the fence's netting.)

IMG_4197.jpg (by changyang1230)
As you would expect from a photography trip, lots of people were seen busy taking pictures;

IMG_4205.jpg (by changyang1230)
but you could also see some others having fun by playing with animals they don't really know how to handle;

IMG_4284a.jpg (by changyang1230)
and kids having simply a whale of a time.

IMG_4295.jpg (by changyang1230)
After spending a couple of hours in the animal farm, we set off to...

As always, you can spoil the story for yourself at my flickr photo album: Fotoholics Mornington Camp Mar 08.

[to be continued...]
[Apr 7: Continued here]

5 comments:

Saturday, April 05, 2008

Free Range Chicken

For a very, very, very, very long time, I thought free range chicken means free size chicken.

3 comments:

Friday, April 04, 2008

Some Questions About Water

When my housemates and I were having dinner yesterday night, someone brought out some interesting questions:

  1. There is a boat on a lake, and inside the boat there is a guy and a stone. The guy throws the stone out of the boat. Will the water level of the lake rise, fall, or remain the same? Here the water level is in reference to the land, not the water level of the boat. Also, assume that the total water volume of the lake is constant.

  2. What if instead of a stone, the person breaks a wooden plank from the boat and throw it into the lake? Assume that the plank is less dense than the water.

  3. You are swimming on the lake. You peed. What will happen to the water level of the lake? What if you are diving instead of swimming?

  4. You are sitting on a bath tub with the plug on and some water in the tub. You peed. What will happen to the water level?

  5. Same with 4, but instead of peeing, you poo-ed. What will happen to the water level? What about fart? (Thanks to Thow Kong for the brilliant question. :P)
Question 1 is supposedly one of the questions asked during the Oxford university interview. If you are able to solve number 1, you should be able to do the rest since they are kind of similar. Contact Thow Kong for the answer to the last question.

7 comments:

Thursday, April 03, 2008

The REAL Run For the Kids 2008

Apparently no one responded to the "fake" run for the kids post. The video wasn't real, but it's true that I participated in "Run For The Kids" again, on last weekend. This time I joined it together with Wee Loon, Boon Phiaw, Thow Kong, Violet, Kheng Ying, Nooi Hoay and two other juniors from Monash Universities (sorry can't remember the names).

It's a real disappointment that I did not really manage to fare better this year, timing 1:41:54 despite not stopping along the way twice like last year (for toilet break and getting band-aids in first aid station). Last year my average speed was 8.28km/h (that's already averaged in the stoppage); this year it's 8.33km/h without any significant breaks.

Head over to Wee Loon's post for some pictures.

0 comments:

Wednesday, April 02, 2008

Of Windy Day and Fallen Tree Branches

Fallen Branch (by floyduk)It's a windy day. As I braved through the wind, I could see some fallen tree branches on the ground all over the university campus. Those are HUGE branches, there was even one tree that was completely uprooted.

They decided to cordon off the area where the fallen branches are.

The funny thing is, fallen tree branches are not dangerous anymore, as there's no longer any branch above the cordoned area, and nobody is going to "accidentally" trip over the huge branches on the floor. So why do they cordon off the area? Shouldn't they cordon off the other trees instead, in case the other branches fall down?

Weird logic baffles me.

2 comments:

Tuesday, April 01, 2008

Run For The Kids 2008

Last year I ran for the kids in 1:50:07. This year I ran a bit faster, but due to my mixed-up timekeeping, I don't really know the exact time. Will have to wait for the official result later.

You probably do not remember what happened the same time last year. But this year I took a video during the run to give you a better picture. Have a look! :)


[3 Apr: Follow Up]

6 comments:

Monday, March 31, 2008

Of Chinese-Ed, English-Ed and the Many Kinds of Chinese

Note: Adapted from my comment in a ReCom thread.

That was a heck of a long title, but it summarises what I am going to write, i.e. Chinese-educated Chinese, English-Educated Chinese, and the mutual disparagement and aversion between them.

To begin with, let me define the terms in this article. Chinese-ed and English-ed are vague and ill-defined terms; but in the context of Malaysia, Chinese-eds are people who learned Chinese language up to the level of primary school / secondary school / Form 5 (depending on the context); while English-eds are simply any Chinese who are not Chinese-ed. Not terribly accurate terms, but this is how it goes.

If you have been living in Malaysia long enough, I am sure you would have noticed the commonplace prejudice towards people from different education backgrounds. Some Chinese-eds tend to paint a generalised, biased picture of the English-eds, that is, they are often perceived as being more self-centred, ardent admirers of everything from "the West", and most importantly, they "forget their roots". They are often referred to with the derogatory term "bananas" - yellow on the outside, but all white inside. On the other hand, English-eds tend to view the Chinese-eds as being deeply engrossed and obsessive of their language / culture / "root" to the extent of compromising other responsibilities such as the national unity (e.g. the resistance to Vision schools). There is also some counter-aversion by English-ed, stemming from their suffering from prejudice cast by the Chinese-ed.

The rabbit hole goes deeper. Even among the Chinese-eds, you have this stratification of "Chinese-eds who learned the language up to UPSR","Chinese-eds who learned up to PMR but 'betrayed the culture' by dropping SPM Chinese"; and "the TRUE Chinese who took Chinese paper up to SPM without fear for the A2". (See note for more information) The first two groups are deemed to be inferior and more disgraceful than the last group.

I am absolutely appalled by this phenomenon.

Chinese need to wake up to the fact that racial chauvinism is not the way to go in this world, or at the very least, outside China. Yes, written and spoken language are a huge part of a race's identity; but to disparage your fellow friends because of his inability to write, read or speak in Chinese language simply show arrogance and ignorance on your part. Some Chinese in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan etc look down on foreign Chinese who can't speak Mandarin, but to do so is pathetically ignorant of the stories of Chinese diaspora throughout the world.

For the case of "people who didn't take up SPM Chinese" = shameful... why, why, why? Some people might be native Chinese speakers, as they are brought up in a mandarin-speaking family who speak Mandarin and read Chinese papers on a daily basis. Naturally, they will be relatively more fluent and proficient in the language. Some others may have it the harder way, as their family may not be the most conducive environment for learning Chinese, but yet they managed to build a good command in the language through sheer hard work. They definitely deserve our respect. However, some people have never had conducive environment, and had struggled to do well in Chinese language despite continuous effort. In your opinion, are they obliged to take up SPM Chinese just to prove that "they are Chinese", or so that they do not appear to leave out their compatriots who are fighting the cruel grading of SPM Chinese?

I personally know a friend who is from the last category, and he had to go through the ordeal of SPM Chinese as my school makes the subject compulsory. Despite his blood, sweat, and tears, he "only" got an A2 in the end, to much detriment of his scholarship opportunity in spite of his overall excellence in every subject. He only managed to get the scholarship he truly deserved with the help of MCA.

And no, he didn't "become more Chinese", as some claimed SPM Chinese's benefit to be. In fact his aversion towards the language only grew stronger. The only thing we gained from forcing him to take up SPM Chinese, is the false sense of vindication among the overzealous Chinese, who think that "YES, another student has preserved his root and has stood up to the injustice of deviant SPM Chinese marking." But that is also where the benefit ends.

I am all for Chinese learning Chinese language, or for that matter, any foreigner learning Chinese language. It is a beautiful language, it has painted sublime poetry throughout history and adorned the Chinese civilisation. I have always given my wholehearted support for the effort to preserve the opportunity of learning the language in Malaysia and other countries. However, I think that people ought to do away with the systematic discrimination down the "levels of Chinese education", which in turn depends on a lot of factors like opportunity, logistics, interest, and to a huge extent, odds. We need to rethink our obsession of linking Chinese exam papers and Chinese-ness, Chinese identity, Chinese culture or what have you. If there's a single most detrimental effect of the ridiculously low A1 percentage in SPM (with respect to other subjects), in my opinion, it is to widen the divide within the Chinese community.

I must say that I have had enough of it. It ought to be rectified, or there will come a day when I am ashamed to identify myself as part of this racial group.

Note: For the uninitiated, SPM Chinese is one of the most dreaded subjects in the SPM exam, the reason being that only a very low percentage of candidates obtain A1 in it (around 1 - 2% since 2001) compared to most other subjects (around 10 - 20%). Many people dropped this subject in SPM because it lowered their chance of getting scholarships if they did not get an A1. Many people allege that the low percentage is an attempt by the government to deter Chinese from learning their own language, while some claim that this is to cut down the number of Chinese getting the much-coveted JPA scholarship. Read more about this issue in Education Malaysia blog and ReCom (Malaysian Student Forum).

Image Credit: Saratoga News

10 comments: