Saturday, June 17, 2006

Post-Exam Rambling

Just realized one thing I haven't mentioned here - my exams are over!! :D As I said earlier, this exam was kinda shocking when we had our first paper.. I know it wouldn't concern most people, but I would just jot down some notes for record.

Note: This is merely a record for the uninspiring albeit memory-stimulating exams I had. If you have the least of interest in my studies, perhaps you shall stop at this point for the time being, and consider some other blogs, news or online articles. :) My blogroll and linkroll on the left might interest you.

5 June 2006 - CRL Paper 2
[Image]If I were to sum this paper with one word, it would be a "nightmare".

In this paper, basically we are given 100 multiple-choice questions in a duration of 2 hours. Well, some might think that MCQ is nothing, but I can assure you, it is something. In fact, at the end of the paper, most of us came out of the exam hall feeling dazed all over. We could had had a fever for having overworked our tiny brains, regurgitating more facts than it would like to hold.

The fact is, the multiple choice questions are not at all easy to answer. There are some questions which rely entirely on good memories, which unfortunately isn't my forte. It's not that I can't memorise at all, I used to memorise stuff too (duh..) when I was in primary school, with quite some "accomplished" skill. The thing is just that, as I grew to be more fond of concepts than details, I always have this kind of reluctance to rote memorise things which are simply meant to be memorised. It's like, who would have thought that phrenic nerve supplies the centre part of diaphragm and mediastinal pleura, instead of centre part and peripheral part of diaphragm, if not because of memory? (I got this question right by luck, anyway...)

Apart from the memory works, the conceptual questions aren't close to a breeze. Given that we have approximately 72 seconds for each question, it is not hard to appreciate the fact that we have less than ample time to analyze each question carefully and thoughtfully, let alone recheck the answers when we are done. By the way, those questions are not exactly tricky, but they are just hard to answer... There are some vague uncertainties where lecture notes (which I rely solely upon) are insufficient, and will only be obvious to people who have garnered clinical experience.

Just an example... Everyone knows it off the top of their heads that "an FER > 80 indicates restrictive lung disease, normal people's FER is around 80, while FER < 80 indicates obstructive lung disease". But there is this question which gives us an FER of 75 - how can one know for sure, whether this indicates "slight" obstructive lung disease, or a normal lung?! I would like to think that if you haven't read enough Kumar and Clark or worked for some time in a hospital, you wouldn't have much idea.

To sum it up, the MCQ paper is hard, really hard. I would be lucky to be able to score even 70 out of 100. But I will never know, anyway, because it is a closed paper and we will not be able to know our exact scores for this component.

6 June 2006 - ICM OSCE Interview
I guess anyone who knows me well enough would know that ICM interview is one of my most feared subjects in medicine.

Introduction to Clinical Medicine, or ICM for short, is a beginner's crash course to becoming a doctor. It actually endeavours to teach us to be a good communicator... Haha, well, I can't see much point - if you are not empathic, you won't turn into an empathic person by just reading the marking scheme which allocates a mark or two for being empathic. But I guess this kind of "empathic is important" preaching has to be done anyway, lest there will be more and more mean doctors.

Besides learning to be a good communicator, ICM's main point is to teach us what doctors do and why they do what they do (I know I am rambling incoherently know, but it's 2am now so paiseh larr.. :P). During our biweekly ICM lessons, we learn to inspect patient's hearts and lungs, circulation system etc, in addition to interviewing our patients about a medical condition (which in our semester is focused on heart and lung problems).

Alright, back to the ICM OSCE interview.. Basically in this day 2 of the exam, we had an interview with a simulated patient (a fancy word which means the same as actor / actress) for 9 minutes, and we are marked based on our performance in that short duration. In this 9 minutes, we are supposed to know our patients' every slightest detail - from how often he / she has the chest pain to how she is going with his / her family members. Miss one detail? Points deducted!

* Browser hanged, 3 precious paragraphs lost.. Grrhh... :P

Basically, I was saying that ICM is prone to subjectivity and bias since it depends on so many external factors. Good acting skill is of utmost importance, in addition to the basic communication skill. Luck is crucial. Besides, empathy should be feigned with finesse, and checklist approach employed under the disguise of non-checklist questioning style. Talking about checklist approach, I still don't get it today - we have been told since day-1 that "checklist approach should not be used", but how many of us actually got through the interview without having a mental checklist of all the keypoints we ought to find out from the patient?

Anyway, after all the apprehension and nerves, the actual ICM interview turned out to be alright. I would not say I performed very well, since there are so many weaknesses I could nitpick now in retrospection. However, with regard to my actual communication skill, I must say that I have done my best, and I shall leave it to the examiner to judge how much I deserved.

7 June 2006 - HP3 Exam
HP3 is supposed to be fascinating, if not because of some rotten eggs. Well, talk about the exams first, I will leave the rotten eggs to another blog post.

Health Practice is supposed to be an intellectually stimulating subject, since it enlightens us about the way population health policy operates - the principle is like: if you dedicate your time in saving one patient at a time, the most you can do is to save one patient's life. However, if you spend effort in promoting public health, say, about quitting smoking, you can actually save more people's lives with less cost. That, is the principle of public health we were learning all along.

In this semester, we had some sorts of lectures about epidemiology (which was dodgy) which is supposed to be about learning how statistics is employed in medical context, e.g. risks, prognosis, diagnosis etc. We also learnt to read academic papers from journals, and to "appraise" (which is a fancy word for "evaluate") the papers.

Eerm, I shall stop giving summaries and remarks about all our courses, if not I will not end my article at all... :P I am getting sleepy now, and it's time to get some sleep... Just a final note, for the HP exam, it's alright actually, not as hard as I had imagined beforehand. Apart from a few inevitable (yet lame) memorisation questions, most of the questions are answerable.

(... to be continued)


shinwee said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ruyom said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
yoy said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
pang said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
honyang said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
vovo said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
yuking said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
julee said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
coolooc said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
San said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
fong said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
reek said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
youngyew said...

Spammer: If you are willing to spread more valid propaganda, perhaps you shall consider a better channel than spamming an irrelevant blog post. Thanks. :)

Giler punya.. Post 12 comments in one go, if you want to spread your message, be original lar, cut-and-paste, I also know how to do larr... :(

day-dreamer said...

Was shocked at first to see so many comments. After seen one by one being deleted, I know what they are liao... with Word Verification also can pass, not bad ah! :P

My lecturers also said MCQ is more difficult than essay questions, because for the latter if you don't know you can just write rubbish. Once they see the keywords you'll be awarded marks. Hehehe!

Casper said...

walao...changyang, you might want to have a look at bp's post about pharmacy 2 c some spams... hmm... and get him to remove it will ya... haha... my real comments later la...gonna hit my books again...:p

Ka Lip said...

Hmm...I personally prefer MCQs to 'long answer' questions...simply because in the event of being clueless for a particular question, there is still a 20% chance of getting it right. Of course it wouldn't be fair if you were a very good guesser...

In essay questions, it's sometimes hard to gauge how much you're supposed to write, especially if they give you pages and pages for you to paint the town with. I usually feel extremely insecure if what I write is dwarfed by the space that's left...

I thought the HP3 exam wasn't bad either..although there were a few questions that put me at a complete loss..As for those which I had some clue about.. they weren't exactly easy either..

By the way, I think if you contact the course coordinator (Jenny Hayes), she might give you a breakdown of your marks. Apparently a few people did it for semester two.

*waiting in eager anticipation for the continuation of the Post-exam analysis/rambling*

Melissa said...

i agree i agree!! the mcq paper was such a nightmare. i started losing patience in the middle, so much details!!!

bout the breakdown of ur marks, like ka lip said, u can email the subject coordinator. i got mine for sem2.

youngyew said...

Day-dreamer: Yeah, sometimes MCQ can get much more challenging than essay questions... Especially in University, I think.

Casper: Yeah, actually Boon Phiaw got the same spam as mine...

Ka Lip: Eerrm, yeah, I had heard about getting marks through the coordinator... But I was just plain lazy to do it. :P By the way, congrats for your good results. :)

Melissa: Hahaha, yeah, halfway through the paper, I stopped and took some deep breath as I almost started to panic.. :/